while others argue that countries have to take more humanitarian approach. Write an essay in which you discuss your position regarding this debate.
A wide range of people from such countries which inflicted with problems such as war, natural disaster, and persecution have been forced to abandon their homes and seek refugee status in another country. What makes matter worse for people escaping appalling conditions is that numerous countries have chosen to close their borders to refugees. This is wrong both from an ethical point of view and from the point of contributions that refugees may bring to the host countries.
Stricter refugee policies cannot be justified for moral reasons. The first thing we need to keep in mind is that refugees do not decide to move into another country out of personal preferences. Desperate conditions in their home country are forcing them to act like this. This depicts that accepting these people is a more humanitarian approach. When we consider the Syrian example, it is because of the destruction of their houses during the war, these people have fled their country. If they had stayed there, it is likely that they would have been murdered. Let alone leading a happy life, it may not be possible to survive in a war-stricken area.Therefore, it is all other people's moral responsibility to provide aid for refugees. Having stricter refugee policies means abandoning refugees to die.
Another reason why stricter refugee policies should be opposed is that refugees bring a lot advantages into the host country. Numerous refugees such as doctors, academics or teachers are knowledgeable and talented people who are able to add value to their new country, if they are employed in appropriate positions. Besides, refugees create more employment opportunities in local settings by establishing restaurants or other businesses. Furthermore, if the countries which suffer from shortage of young workers incorporate refugees into business market, they may benefit greatly from their presence. Another benefit relates to the social and cultural diversity comes with the refugees. In an age that is characterized by globalization, refugee populations might help for both the host and the guest to create a beneficial cooperation environment.
In conclusion, strict refugee policies do not only a violation of the human rights, but they also ignore various contributions that refugees can make to the host country. For these reasons, countries should stop their policy of closing borders to refugees. Instead of this, in order to address the refugee crisis in a more sound manner, international cooperation should be established.
P.S. : I posted an essay with the same title yesteday and it was little bit less complex in comparison to this one, for sure. To be honest, I have been able to write this essay as it is thanks to Quillbot and Scribens. Nonetheless, I am looking forward to read your reviews relates to this essay. Thanks for your help, in advance.
A wide range of people from such countries which inflicted with problems such as war, natural disaster, and persecution have been forced to abandon their homes and seek refugee status in another country. What makes matter worse for people escaping appalling conditions is that numerous countries have chosen to close their borders to refugees. This is wrong both from an ethical point of view and from the point of contributions that refugees may bring to the host countries.
Stricter refugee policies cannot be justified for moral reasons. The first thing we need to keep in mind is that refugees do not decide to move into another country out of personal preferences. Desperate conditions in their home country are forcing them to act like this. This depicts that accepting these people is a more humanitarian approach. When we consider the Syrian example, it is because of the destruction of their houses during the war, these people have fled their country. If they had stayed there, it is likely that they would have been murdered. Let alone leading a happy life, it may not be possible to survive in a war-stricken area.Therefore, it is all other people's moral responsibility to provide aid for refugees. Having stricter refugee policies means abandoning refugees to die.
Another reason why stricter refugee policies should be opposed is that refugees bring a lot advantages into the host country. Numerous refugees such as doctors, academics or teachers are knowledgeable and talented people who are able to add value to their new country, if they are employed in appropriate positions. Besides, refugees create more employment opportunities in local settings by establishing restaurants or other businesses. Furthermore, if the countries which suffer from shortage of young workers incorporate refugees into business market, they may benefit greatly from their presence. Another benefit relates to the social and cultural diversity comes with the refugees. In an age that is characterized by globalization, refugee populations might help for both the host and the guest to create a beneficial cooperation environment.
In conclusion, strict refugee policies do not only a violation of the human rights, but they also ignore various contributions that refugees can make to the host country. For these reasons, countries should stop their policy of closing borders to refugees. Instead of this, in order to address the refugee crisis in a more sound manner, international cooperation should be established.
P.S. : I posted an essay with the same title yesteday and it was little bit less complex in comparison to this one, for sure. To be honest, I have been able to write this essay as it is thanks to Quillbot and Scribens. Nonetheless, I am looking forward to read your reviews relates to this essay. Thanks for your help, in advance.
