The IELTS Speaking test consists of three sections, and it is the last part that demands the most critical thinking. Part 3 necessitates the explanation of abstract topics concisely and coherently. The question asked by the examiner will always be based on the theme followed in Part 2, wherein the candidate must analyze, compare, and then justify his/her opinion. Many candidates perform poorly in this section because they require critical thinking, high-order vocabulary, and spontaneous responses. However, candidates can still show a dramatic change in their performance with the proper techniques.
For instance, if the examiner asks, "Do you think technology has improved communication?" a well-structured answer might be:
"Yes, technology has significantly enhanced communication. It allows instant messaging, video calls, and social media interactions, making conversations more convenient. For example, professionals can collaborate globally through platforms like Zoom. However, some argue that technology has reduced face-to-face interactions, leading to weaker personal connections."
"Technological advancements have revolutionised communication, making interactions more efficient and accessible."
"Governments could invest in efficient public transport systems to discourage private car use. Additionally, implementing congestion charges, as seen in London, can help reduce traffic volume."
Example:
Examiner’s question: "Do you think young people should be encouraged to start their own businesses?"
Better response: "In my opinion, motivating young individuals to become entrepreneurs can be highly beneficial."
1. Develop a Structured Approach to Answers
One of the most effective ways to improve Part 3 responses is to structure answers logically. A good approach is the "IDEA" method:- Introduce the main idea concisely.
- Develop the idea by explaining it further.
- Example – Provide a relevant example to support the idea.
- Alternative Viewpoint – Acknowledge a different perspective or counterargument.
For instance, if the examiner asks, "Do you think technology has improved communication?" a well-structured answer might be:
"Yes, technology has significantly enhanced communication. It allows instant messaging, video calls, and social media interactions, making conversations more convenient. For example, professionals can collaborate globally through platforms like Zoom. However, some argue that technology has reduced face-to-face interactions, leading to weaker personal connections."
2. Use a Range of Vocabulary and Complex Sentences
Using diverse vocabulary and complex grammatical structures can improve fluency and coherence. Instead of using common words like "good" or "bad," candidates should use precise academic vocabulary, such as:- Positive impact: beneficial, advantageous, transformative
- Negative impact: detrimental, counterproductive, problematic
- Comparisons: in contrast, conversely, on the other hand
- Cause and effect: consequently, as a result, thus
"Technological advancements have revolutionised communication, making interactions more efficient and accessible."
3. Develop Critical Thinking Skills
Part 3 questions often require analytical thinking. To prepare, candidates should practise answering "why" and "how" questions. They should also consider:- The causes and effects of a situation
- Different perspectives on an issue
- Possible solutions or improvements
"Governments could invest in efficient public transport systems to discourage private car use. Additionally, implementing congestion charges, as seen in London, can help reduce traffic volume."
4. Practise Paraphrasing the Question
A common mistake candidates make is repeating the examiner’s question verbatim. Instead, they should paraphrase it using synonyms or different structures.Example:
Examiner’s question: "Do you think young people should be encouraged to start their own businesses?"
Better response: "In my opinion, motivating young individuals to become entrepreneurs can be highly beneficial."